Harnessing The Power of Analytics

dipan Dipan Karumsi, Managing Director,
KPMG Procurement Advisory Services
gnome-mime-application-xhtml+xml KPMG’s Procurement Advisory services focus
on delivering enhanced business performance and
driving bottom-line savings. Let us help you transform
the way you source and manage your supply base.

In our last post we talked about spend analytics, the danger of the “other” category, and how it can easily lead to unreliable data. Today we’ll talk about how a standardized taxonomy can create dependable analytics.

analytics For many organizations, the United Nations Standard Products and Services Code (UNSPSC®), a standard product taxonomy that’s on the market, can be a good starting point for building or cleaning up categories. It provides standardized reporting, but it can also be overwhelming for some enterprises because of the level of detail it contains. This can end up creating more confusion, depending on the skill and experience of the people using the system.

You can edit the UNSPSC® down or roll some things up into larger categories, keeping organizational fit and alignment in mind. If you have too many categories and the distinctions are too fine, you’ll get the same item showing up in different categories. Then you’ll start to get those, “Where did my spend go?” types of questions which quickly lead to data distrust. On the other hand, if you decrease the categories available to the end user, sometimes they just won’t have what they need.

Every organization is different, and you have to identify what makes sense for your situation. Your taxonomy has to strike a balance between providing the visibility and data you need to manage effectively, while simultaneously not being too onerous for end users to adopt easily.

One key note: Taxonomy development should not be done in a bubble. Creating a spend taxonomy should be a collaborative process that includes a broad group of stakeholders. The more input you receive, the greater the buy-in will be on utilization and self-service reporting. pull-quote4

While some organizations opt to refine their taxonomy as they mature, I recommend they clearly define and deploy it up front. Constant changes in the way users see the taxonomy can cause confusion. In addition, spend reporting will be impacted if categories are removed, edited, or added, and alignment of workflow approvals to categories will need to be updated each time it is changed.

Most important of all, do not create a category called “other” (or “miscellaneous” or “uncategorized”.) Getting real time visibility into spend is one of the big goals here. Allowing this kind of category automatically introduces the need for a manual process, which causes delays and inaccuracy.

If “other” is not an option, end users will learn to find the right category. Procurement can provide information and training to help. Since most requesters concentrate on a handful of 10-15 categories, they’ll be very effective at selecting the right ones once they learn them.

An up front investment in creating a thoughtful taxonomy is going to give everyone across the enterprise the ability to run accurate, real-time ad hoc reports in the eProcurement application. This is the power of analytics, and once people experience it and see how much easier it makes their jobs, having no “other” will be no issue.

For Spend Analytics You Can Trust, There Can Be No “Other”

dipan Dipan Karumsi, Managing Director,
KPMG Procurement Advisory Services
gnome-mime-application-xhtml+xml KPMG’s Procurement Advisory services focus on delivering enhanced business performance and driving bottom-line savings. Visit us on the Advisory Institutes to learn more about how we combine thought leadership and global perspectives to help you transform the way you source and manage your supply base.

In my last post, I talked about how timely access to data can help procurement organizations avoid embarrassing moments with suppliers. Now let’s turn our attention to getting quality data downstream.

analytics This requires not only having broad adoption of the eProcurement tool, but also having a well-defined category taxonomy and making sure people know how to use it accurately. The taxonomy is where many organizations fall down; they simply don’t put enough time and thought into developing it, and thus create continuous challenges in getting access to quality spend data.
Developing a well-defined taxonomy takes discipline and thought. Yet, in the rush to deploy the system, organizations may create a bare minimum of categories without the appropriate levels, leave the category field optional, or even skip this step altogether, which then creates a rush to create this information at the time of go-live. pull-quote-1

Or, they may create a category called “other.” If you want analytics you can trust, you need a category for everything. There can be no “other.” “Other” gives people who don’t want to think too hard an easy way out. Before you know it, you’ve got “other” showing up as 20% of your overall spend, which requires a significant re-categorization effort and can cause considerable data distrust.

An unorganized taxonomy also creates a lot of churn downstream. If you have transactions being routed by category to the buying organization, they’re going to have to research and identify the correct categories, adding time and manual effort into the process. The most efficient way to get quality data out of your analytics system is to make sure your taxonomy and process is defined across the entire value chain from the start. Think of it as pre-analytics.

One of the first things we do when we work with an organization on sourcing or procure-to-pay is look at the spend taxonomy to see how it’s organized and understand how well the organization aligns around it. Is everything in alignment, or are there a number of unmanaged categories that have significant areas of spend? Is there a lot of spending in an “other” category?

Insight into this information brings us to the topic of taxonomy development and how it can unleash the power of analytics, which is where we’ll pick up in the next post.

Digital “Haves” and “Have Nots” [Video]

By Lee Ann Moore, Director, Industries and Marketing

In the video below, KPMG’s Dave Wolf and John McCarthy of Forrester Research discuss how organizations need to rethink their approach to technology to support a digital-enabled business model – one that is both customer- and employee-centric. It requires agility and an iterative process, often quite different from historic approaches to technology implementation and upgrades. Historic approaches, typically managed by static organizations, took an inside-out view as opposed to the customer-centered, dynamic outside-in perspective expected today. This shift may require a digital transformation, or at least a planned journey toward digital enablement. Without embracing these changes, organizations risk becoming “Digital Have Nots” and falling further behind in today’s increasingly dynamic and competitive marketplace.

Cynergy Video

For further information or ideas on a customer-centric approach to digital transformation, contact David Wolf or Lee Ann Moore.

2Q 2014 Pulse Survey Results: Five Key Takeaways for Global Business Services (GBS)

Stan Lepeak, Global Research Director, KPMG LLP


One key to driving greater global business services (GBS) maturity is improving the underlying capabilities of IT, both as a collective set of technologies and as the IT group, used to support GBS efforts, and better aligning them with these efforts. More standardized IT applications and systems enable a more integrated IT environment. Standards are critical to creating more integrated and end-to-end GBS operations across functions, geographies, and business units. Key to enabling this standardization is greater integration of IT operations into the GBS organization as well as formalized joint governance structures. It is also critical to define specific IT “innovation” strategies to exploit the creative potential of existing and new technologies, such as robotics process automation, to drive GBS maturity and integration.

Read: 2Q14 Global Pulse Survey Report


Challenges abound in any major service delivery change effort. They are many and varied, and unfortunately most of them are not new. They include weak or neglected change management capabilities and the perennial retained organization, transition, and governance issues. While organizations have improved their skills to address these challenges, the steady increase in the scale and scope of today’s GBS efforts continues to increase the complexity of these issues. To succeed, organizations need to balance their GBS ambitions against their capabilities to successfully address these challenges.

Read: The Art of Services Governance


Greater standardization of IT applications and systems, particularly enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, is a key enabler of greater GBS maturity and integration. While moving towards a single instance of ERP to support GBS operations is not practical for many companies, it is advisable to at least strive for a model with a common ERP architecture and template across multiple instances of ERP and related enterprise systems.

Read: Service Integration: Maximizing the Benefits, and Minimizing the Risks, of a Multi-Sourced IT Environment


As greater focus is placed on the role of IT in enabling GBS success, IT organizations need to start to assess and “benchmark” the capabilities of their own GBS IT operations against industry best practices. Emerging frameworks such as enterprise services management provide the potential to help enable this.

Read: Executive Dilemma: Is Benchmarking the Right Path to Defining Opportunities for Improvement?


There are many drivers for organizations’ service delivery improvement efforts and even more challenges faced in successfully completing these efforts. Reducing operating costs remains the top driver; however, it is an assumed and tactical benefit. Improving process performance as well as global service delivery capabilities and operating models have gained in importance as GBS drivers. End-to-end process ownership, integration of GBS efforts across functions, and better integration of shared services and outsourcing efforts under the GBS umbrella are some of the keys to achieving these goals.

 Read: Drive to the top: The Journey, Lessons, and Standards of Global Business Services

For more on Global Business Services and other related topics, please view our library of papers on the KPMG Shared Services and Outsourcing Institute.

Spend Analytics Helps Avoid Awkward Moments With Suppliers

Dipan Karumsi, Managing Director, KPMG Procurement Advisory Services

Working with organizations in various sourcing and procurement roles over the past 17 years, one of the common challenges I see is not having access to information on a timely basis. The good news is, real-time, or near real-time spend analytics is within reach for companies willing to undertake a process of continual improvement, and there is a definite competitive edge to be gained by doing so.

Based on what I have seen, a three-month lag from the time of spend to availability of reporting is common, and many organizations cannot get access to data about spend that took place as long as six months ago. Real-time data is almost out of the question for most organizations, because by the time they run the reports, check for data integrity and test to make sure there are no big issues, a couple months have gone by.

The further you get down the road, the more likely it is that you’ll be looking at many transactions that will never recur, spending valuable time and effort on things you can’t optimize.

Lack of timely data, or bad data, can also create some awkward moments, such as having to go to your suppliers and ask them how much money you spent with them. This happens more often than you would think, and the supplier will simply ask, “For what time frame?” and they’ll usually be able to run the reports very quickly because they know their business on the customer side and can give you detailed information.

Not only is this an embarrassing situation, you also run the risk that they only give you what you ask for, or withhold material information. They’re not going to want to share anything that puts you in a better negotiating position. Robust spend analytics helps you avoid these awkward moments and show up to supplier negotiations with more information than they have.

Better, faster access to information lets procurement organizations make smarter decisions across the board, leverage their spend across business units or plants or sites, and really drive value through savings in the sourcing process. This is one of the goals that many companies are looking to achieve through their e-procurement initiatives.

Both direct and indirect spend are critical areas for organizations, though traditionally the focus has been on direct spend. In recent years I have noted that attitudes about indirect spend have changed significantly. Many organizations which previously ignored indirect spend because it was “less strategic” or smaller in value have begun to take interest in this spend, recognizing that the opportunity to drive value is in fact quite significant.

Most organizations are now organizing the procurement function to focus on indirect spend but in many cases have not invested in people, processes and technologies needed to manage it. They are just now starting to realize there are many applications that focus on getting visibility into indirect spend to drive additional value.

As organizations evolve in this direction, a question that quickly surfaces is how to set up spend analytics. One way is directly through the procurement tool. Another option is to pull the information into a broader data warehouse that has access to all the other areas of spend, including direct spend, so can you can generate reports from a single database. If you have global operations, you may want to pull data from all geographies so that you have access to all of your global data in one location. There are different ways to do it, but a key consideration is the speed with which you get access to that data.

The other key consideration is of course data quality. I see many companies that have access to data, but people don’t trust it. What ends up happening is they have to go to the individual parties in the organization that are doing the purchasing and ask a lot of questions, or again, back to the suppliers to get the information. It’s inefficient, and it’s humiliating.

The organizations I see that are doing this well are those that have e-procurement platforms and have placed a focus on driving adoption across the organization. They’ve set up a well-defined spend taxonomy, and made sure people know how to use it. Categories are required for all spend, and they have a governance structure with clearly defined roles that have the ability to approve category selection within the taxonomy. Additionally, they don’t use a category called “other” or “miscellaneous.”

Ultimately, the most efficient way to categorize transactions is to do it up front; this ensures a quick flow into the downstream analytics system and gets you quicker access to the information.

Remember, getting access to real time visibility is the big goal here. That doesn’t happen overnight, but as you start to get your category taxonomy deployed, upstream systems straightened out, and processes established, the effort around data validation should decrease.

The data should get better and better over time, so you get to the point where users can run reports in the application on an ad hoc basis with complete confidence. Then they are empowered to make smarter decisions and avoid those awkward supplier moments.


KPMG’s Procurement Advisory services focus on delivering enhanced business performance and driving bottom-line savings. Visit us on the Advisory Institutes to learn more about how we combine thought leadership and global perspectives to help you transform the way you source and manage your supply base.

Taking a Pulse on Global Business Services – Moving Up the Maturity Curve an Uphill Battle

Stan Lepeak, Global Research Director, KPMG LLP

KPMG recently released the results of its quarterly, global 1Q14 Sourcing Advisory Pulse surveys. These Pulse surveys provide insights into trends and projections in end-user organizations’ usage of global business services (GBS). The learnings are gleaned from KPMG firms’ advisors, who are working closely with end-user organizations that are actively exploring or undertaking GBS initiatives, as well as from leading global business and IT service providers. We highlighted the top findings from the 1Q14 Pulse in a prior blog.

The first-quarter edition of the Sourcing Advisory Pulse took a deeper dive into the state of GBS usage among organizations in the market today. GBS adoption rates continue to accelerate as illustrated in the Pulse survey, KPMG’s client work, and via a recent wide-ranging KPMG market study on GBS trending. For some organizations, “GBS” is mainly lip service to a new acronym using old service delivery models of shared services and outsourcing. But for others, it is a more fundamental rethink of back- and front-office service delivery best practices. Increasingly for more progressive organizations, GBS is an operating model and strategic governance framework that helps them transform end-to-end business support services to deliver more effective solutions for both the internal and external customers of the organization. GBS efforts focus on optimizing the mix of human capital, service delivery models, process innovation, and technology to deliver services on an enterprise-wide, cross-functional basis, to support the business strategy. Many of these organizations are continuing to expand the scale and scope of their GBS effortsto include a broad range of business and IT functions and processes. This expansion is also occurring geographically, cross-functionally—linking and integrating adjacent functions—and from an end-to-end process standpoint.

The maturity of GBS capabilities in most organizations adopting the model, however, is still often evolving, or more bluntly, quite weak overall in most functional areas where the model is applied (see Figure 1). While more organizations are improving GBS maturity within individual process areas such as finance and accounting, or within a single business unit or geography, most still struggle with managing processes on an end-to-end basis (i.e., source to pay as opposed to just within account payables) or between operations supported via both shared services and outsourcing. In this respect, as GBS efforts expand, the bar is being raised on what is “good enough” much less best in class GBS capabilities.

9253 Fig 1


Yet pursuing a GBS model with the goal of end-to-end process ownership across all geographies and business units in a highly integrated manner is not practically achievable for most organizations and in many cases impractical given overall business models. A firm organized in a looser, federated, or holding company model, for example, would benefit less from a highly integrated back-office GBS model and the level of effort it would take to achieve. In this context, not all firms pursuing GBS maturity should necessarily strive for the top level of maturity, but most organizations can drive much more GBS maturity before they achieve what is optimal for their firms’ situations. It is also critical to balance their GBS expansion ambitions with their capabilities to adequately manage these efforts.

Driving GBS maturity is a multidimensional effort. Inherent to improving GBS maturity is greater consolidation and leveraging of common IT systems and applications and business process models including adoption of leading practices to deliver the in-scope services more efficiently and effectively. End-to-end process ownership, overall governance between collective shared services and outsourcing efforts, the integration of IT services into GBS business functions, and talent management of GBS resources are all common areas where many organizations must improve capabilities. While determining how mature is “enough” depends on many organization-specific factors, most GBS adopters are at the early stages of their maturity improvement efforts. Improving GBS maturity is critical to achieving the typical stated benefits sought from GBS efforts but also to maintain organizational operational competitiveness on a global scale. Indeed, KPMG research increasingly finds direct correlation between improved GBS maturity and market leading or at least market competitive financial performance as assessed by such metrics as profitability and return on equity.


Five Keys to Succeed in “Running IT Like a Business”

Steve Bates, Principal, CIO Advisory

Mandates for enterprise IT departments have taken a 180° turn since the 2008 financial crisis began easing. While board of directors and business leadership had been calling for slashed costs, their new directives are for provision of IT transparency and proof of real, tangible business value delivered.

Realizing the need to transform IT into a high-performing, value-focused business partner, an increasing number of CIOs and CFOs are turning to Technology Business Management (TBM), which is effectively a discipline to “run IT like a business.” They are finding that TBM helps them by:

  • Enabling collaboration among IT, finance, and business partners
  • Driving alignment between technology supply and business demand
  • Guiding and demonstrating the value of technology to business partners
  • Utilizing the principles of marketplace economics to drive change.

For organizations beginning to embark on a TBM journey, following are five KPMG-identified keys to succeed in running IT like a business.

The demand for IT transparency starts at the top

Boards and executive leaders are demanding IT make a significant change in its capabilities. The result is altering the very fabric of how organizations invest in and interact with both customers and suppliers. KPMG’s podcast, IT Transparency: New Capabilities Driven by the Boardroom, provides more details.

IT transparency enables transformation

IT transparency can transform the relationship between IT and business from a supply-based model to a business-demand consumption model. The second in KPMG’s IT Transparency podcast series, IT Transparency: An Accelerant to Transformation, delivers insights into how IT transparency enables transformation, why traditional IT delivery models cannot react with agility to changing business conditions, and the new lens through which IT is being evaluated.

IT staff must gain new capabilities to run IT like a business

To achieve IT transparency success, the IT organization must make fundamental behavior shifts to ensure value is delivered and business measures are achieved. KPMG explores this topic in its third IT Transparency podcast, IT Transparency: Changing the IT Mindset.

Changing the IT discussion from a cost to a value investment

Managing the business of IT through an integrated view of technology cost, performance, supply, and demand is a value-oriented conversation bigger than IT alone. To transform from technology provider to value-focused business partner, IT must address its business audience and tie into corporate culture, strategy, and goals. KPMG’s thought leadership paper – Moving Information Technology from a Cost to an Investmentdelves deeply into the three domains of TBM, the four stages of value optimization, and managing the journey and realizing value.

Learn from your peers

First American Financial Corporation, a TBM pioneer, recently shared with KPMG its multi-step journey from legacy spreadsheet-based models to collaboration with its business units, and its challenges and successes along the path to running IT like a business. The KPMG podcast, The TBM Journey at First American Financial Corporation, provides valuable lessons learned that have practical application to your own organization’s TBM initiative.

To learn more about KPMG’s approach to TBM and how we can help you run IT like a business, please contact me at sjbates@kpmg.com.

Taking a Pulse on Global Business Services – Short Term Progress but a Long Term Journey

Stan Lepeak, Global Research Director, KPMG LLP

KPMG recently released  the results of its quarterly, global 1Q14 Sourcing Advisory Pulse surveys. These Pulse surveys provide insights into trends and projections in end-user organizations’ usage of global business services (GBS). The learnings are gleaned from KPMG firms’ advisors, who are working closely with end-user organizations that are actively exploring or undertaking GBS initiatives, as well as from leading global business and IT service providers.

The first quarter edition of the Sourcing Advisory Pulse performed a recurring and ongoing analysis on general trends in the used of shared services, outsourcing, and global business services, including market demand and deal characteristics for third party services.  It also took a deeper dive into the macro state of the GBS market and the impact current economic and geopolitical market conditions are having on global sourcing.  The following are the key findings from this quarter’s Sourcing Advisory Pulse survey.

9252 Figure 1

Do You Have the Right KPIs to Run IT Like a Business?

Dave Conroy, Managing Director, CIO Advisory

You might remember the old saying about the cobbler’s children—they have no shoes. In fact, the IT function has long been providing “shoes” for everyone in the company except itself as it helps the CEO, COO, and other business leaders exploit information and business intelligence for competitive advantage.

But what if we think about the CIO as the leader of a business that just happens to be IT? Then we can better understand how the right analytics can enable CIOs to gain the insight they need to truly run IT as a business. Basically, it all comes down to leveraging the same practices and measurements that IT customers have been using for years.

Needed: an end-to-end view

Today’s IT function is an enabler for success, serving as a partner that drives innovation, finds new ways to exploit emerging technologies for competitive advantage, and works with its customers to understand demand and then effectively deliver new services and solutions around this demand. In the same way, the IT leadership model also needs a strong focus on demand, with an end-to-end view across the entire IT value chain, not just a point solution. This means that CIOs need to develop a balanced perspective around their investment and service delivery portfolio; retain a strong sense of governance, risk, and control; and bring that entire package together to create the right value both for the IT function and for the customers they serve.

Finding the right KPIs

The real challenge about analytics for the IT organization is not absence of data. IT is flooded with information generated by IT service management, help desks, CMDBs, the complexity of the project portfolio, tracking systems, etc. Instead, the real challenge is how to find the KPIs that IT leaders can use to make the best changes, interventions, and decisions for their IT organization.

These KPIs should go beyond traditional IT metrics involving budget, cost of IT, SLAs, scalability, and reliability. They need to be KPIs that allow CIOs to answer fundamental questions about their organization, such as “how well are the IT projects aligned to the business priorities?” and “how well is the IT organization positioned to enable rapid entry into new markets?”

Since information gathering takes time and resources away from other tasks, CIOs really need to focus just on those five or ten KPIs that actually make a difference. Using a top-down approach, CIOs can build dashboards that provide valuable business intelligence to support decision making without inflicting any unnecessary overhead on the IT organization.

The right information at the right time from the right sources

Developing the right kind of KPIs for IT isn’t something that comes off the shelf with a technology solution. Sure, there are analytical engines out there, along with data warehouses and a host of platforms that are used to facilitate the process, but if you are unclear about the KPIs that drive true value, then all of that technology is largely misguided.

A KPMG-developed framework, called the Intelligent Enterprise, helps business leaders get the right information at the right time from the right sources. This framework can also be applied to the IT organization. In a nutshell, it can define the right KPIs and strategic measures as a function of IT’s business strategy. These KPIs may not necessarily be discrete data points. What they should be are strategic indicators of performance.

KPIs for the IT organization are all about getting the basics right and establishing an environment that has a data hierarchy aligned around the IT organization’s goals and objectives. Three or four years down the road, the next step might be predictive analytics and being able to mine unstructured information for greater insight. For now, however, we think the big opportunity for IT is about finding the most efficient and effective way to deploy the resources of the IT organization as a whole to deliver the best results for their business customers. And that’s not a challenge that requires the most sophisticated big data analysis techniques. It’s more profound. It’s organizational, using the right KPIs to track the things that truly move the needle for the IT function.

Hear Dave talk about how CIOs are utilizing management information as business intelligence to make the most effective decisions in terms of running the business of IT in the KPMG Advisory Institute podcast: IT Analytics Shape the Future of the IT Organization.

New Study Shows Major Investment in Global Business Services

Companies to spend $40 billion annually. Analytics, IT, and talent cited as success factors. 

Global Business Services (GBS) is a next generation operating model for driving performance, added value, and deeper savings in business services.

Among other benefits, GBS can help organizations to lower costs, get products to market faster by using their process footprint, quickly integrate acquisitions to accelerate growth, and drive growth in emerging markets by seamlessly supporting operations in new geographies.

We’d like to share some highlights about the primary challenges and opportunities of GBS for 2014, based on findings from “The Global Business Services Industry Study,” one of the largest and most comprehensive GBS studies ever conducted. Conducted by KPMG and HfS Research, the study covered the dynamics and intentions of 416 enterprises, with more than $1 billion in revenue, representing various regions and industries.

Key findings from the study
In the study, almost two-thirds of respondents from mature companies said they intend to move to GBS or significantly evolve their GBS within the next two to three years. Even more telling, we found evidence suggesting that —

  • Global enterprises plan to spend $40 billion dollars per year on improvements in GBS.
  • Back-office centralization is well developed, with the majority of companies (51 percent) already centralized.
  • Analytics will provide the value-differentiator for GBS organizations, providing strategic operational analytics to improve services, contain costs, and enhance decision making.
  • GBS organizational models fundamentally change the structure of companies by replacing traditional siloes with matrixed processes.
  • Limited executive experience in key areas slows progress.

Success with GBS
According to our recent study as well as our experience in the field, the successful development of GBS can include the following initiatives.

Developing an effective, long-term, analytics road map
Accessing meaningful data to support decision-making will provide a crucial value-differentiator for GBS organizations, with three-quarters of enterprises viewing investments in analytics as important for reducing costs, gathering more data on customers, and improving profits. Success will be measured by process improvement, cost control, and the capability of governance executives to produce quality operational data upon which to support management decisions.

Supporting business enablement of IT
Most mature GBS organizations own multifunctional processes, as well as the underlying technology. With today’s technology, they can integrate the back office with the front office, managing cohesive, end-to-end processes that connect disparate systems, owners, and activities. They can also organize skill sets in appropriate groups to drive efficiency and additional controls. Furthermore, they can support multiple services within a diverse commercial enterprise resource planning (ERP) environment, while taking advantage of multi-tenant platforms offered by software-as-a-service (SaaS) providers.

Improving talent management
With new technology, changing markets, and the growing complexity of business requirements, talent shortages–especially in middle- and higher-level roles–remain a top challenge for GBS organizations. GBS organizations can determine the right mix of in-house training, third-party resources, and outside recruitment to gain the skill sets they need. It is important to be seen as an “employer of choice.” Bringing in the right talent will help foster innovation and prepare the organization for the future.

Learn more
Access “The Global Business Services Industry Study” to learn more about GBS trends and issues. Topics include:

  • An exploration of the newest global operating models to enable new technologies, capture the value from data and analytics, empower the business, and simplify the extended enterprise
  • Leading practices for planning and implementing global business services
  • Process and industry trends
  • Progress toward achieving global business services
  • Desired business outcomes
  • Operating maturity and readiness
  • Actions needed to drive success
  • The future role of analytics and data governance